Manages and administers University information systems, including, learning management systems, student management.
Manages and administers University information systems, including, learning management systems, student management.
27d ago
27d ago
Xavier University - Ateneo de Cagayan
(9 reviews)
Project Engineer salary at Xavier University - Ateneo de Cagayan
Project Engineer salary estimate at Xavier University - Ateneo de Cagayan
Industry estimateThe average salary for this role in the education, training & professional development industry
₱25K - ₱30K
per monthRefreshed 2 Apr 2026
Jobs at Xavier University - Ateneo de Cagayan
Based on your search activitySalary satisfaction at Xavier University - Ateneo de Cagayan
44%
When Xavier University - Ateneo de Cagayan employee's were asked 'How would you rate your salary?'44% of employee's rated the salary as high or average
What’s it like working at Xavier University - Ateneo de Cagayan?
AI summary of recent reviews
Employees at Xavier University - Ateneo de Cagayan appreciate the fun and engaging students, as well as the opportunities for professional development through further studies, community service, and retreats. The positive working environment and open communication are also highlighted, along with supportive superiors who are eager to guide and teach employees. Additionally, reviewers valued the financial benefits and enhancements provided, such as retreats, seminars, and team-building sessions.
However, there were some potential challenges mentioned, including concerns about the university's policies prioritising parents and students over employees, and a perceived focus on generating revenue. The availability of course materials for new teachers was also raised as an issue. During the COVID-19 pandemic, reviewers found it challenging to deliver instructions effectively due to remote learning and internet connectivity barriers. Low salaries were mentioned by multiple reviewers as a potential challenge, along with concerns about heavy workloads, particularly when organising large events or research projects without adequate assistance. Additionally, some reviewers noted resistance to change from managers, deans, and department heads who were comfortable with their existing management styles, and concerns about the evaluation methods used in some departments, with a heavy reliance on peer evaluations.