My experience at TIIC has been both rewarding and formative. Under the mentorship of Engr. Al Bodios, I was given opportunities that pushed me beyond my comfort zone and allowed me to build confidence, resilience, and technical expertise in engineering. The exposure to complex tasks and responsibilities has shaped me into a stronger professional, with a clear benchmark of excellence to strive for.
At the same time, I also encountered challenges, particularly with the salary scheme under the 9.6-hour compressed work schedule and the administrative support processes, which were often slow, lacked coordination, and at times seemed influenced by internal politics.
Overall, TIIC provided me with valuable learning, professional growth, and real-world experience in engineering—made meaningful through the right mentorship and leadership.The good thingsWhat I value most about my time at TIIC is the opportunity to grow under the guidance and support of our Manager, Engr. Al Bodios. He did not just assign tasks—he mentored, challenged, and tailored his approach to help me become the professional I am today. His deep knowledge and expertise in the engineering field serve as my benchmark and a goal I continue to strive for.
The responsibilities entrusted to me were often beyond my comfort zone, but they pushed me to develop confidence, resilience, and a stronger sense of accountability. These experiences have given me both technical proficiency and a broader understanding of what it takes to deliver excellence in engineering.
TIIC provides great exposure to complex engineering works, but what truly makes the difference is having the right leadership. With the proper guidance and management, the company becomes not just a workplace but a training ground where people can thrive, grow, and be inspired to achieve more.
The challengesOne of the aspects I found less favorable at TIIC is the salary scheme under the 9.6-hour compressed work schedule, which does not always feel fair in relation to the workload. Another concern is the administrative support, particularly from HR. The processing of requests and concerns is often slow and lacks proper coordination with employees, which sometimes leads to unnecessary delays. At times, decisions also appeared to be influenced more by internal politics or seniority rather than by fairness and merit.