Unfair Treatment and Favoritism in Training ProcessThe good thingsStructured training materials.
The challengesI recently participated in a one-day training session with SGS & Co., with the goal of securing a work-from-home position. Initially, the session started well, but as the day progressed, it became evident that favoritism and bias played a significant role in the training environment.
One trainee, in particular, managed to connect with the trainer on a personal level, which seemed to influence the trainer’s attitude and behavior toward the group. Despite this individual contributing very little to the actual training exercises and activities, they were consistently given preferential treatment, while others, including myself, were left out of key learning moments.
There was a clear shift after the first break, where the trainer's focus turned toward certain individuals, and I was no longer given the same level of attention or guidance. At one point, comments were made about "bad personality traits", which created an uncomfortable atmosphere for some of the trainees. This shift in tone seemed unnecessary and contributed to a sense of unease among those who were genuinely trying to engage with the material. This imbalance in treatment made it difficult to fully engage in the session.
Later, when taking the final exam, it became apparent that merit was not the primary factor in determining who passed. Despite the uneven participation, a few individuals were selected, and it felt like these decisions were based on favoritism rather than performance.
Overall, the experience was disheartening, with a lack of transparency and fairness throughout the training process. I believe the company should take steps to ensure equal opportunities for all participants, with more focus on merit and less on personal connections.